Judging Criteria for the Outstanding Research, Planning, and Policy Award

METHODOLOGY: It must have appropriate and robust methodology including evidence of peer review. When responding to this criteria consider:
• How to demonstrate that the process and output of the research, policy and planning nomination is "reliable"
• The methodology/process has been undertaken in the development of this piece of work
• How you decided what was the best approach to take
• Whether the work been peer reviewed

 

APPLICATION (NB. X 1.5): It must have practical application to the recreation and leisure industry. When responding to this criteria consider:
• How the work will it be applied and over what timeframe
• Whether it would have relevance and could be applied in other similar communities

IMPACT: The actual and/or potential impact of the research/planning/policy. When responding to this criteria consider:
• What the intended use for this piece of work is
• What the intended impact was/is
• If the work has been applied what impact there has been
• How the impact was/ will be measured
• Whether you got the result you were expecting
• If not why not

 

INNOVATION (NB x 1.5): Degree of innovation or uniqueness. When responding to this criteria consider:
• What it is about this piece of works that makes it innovative/unique
• Demonstrate that this is not repeating information or research that already exists
• Whether it is completely new
• What makes it different from similar pieces of work - the methodology/process or something different

 

COST/VALUE: How does the value of the work compare to the cost of carrying it out. When responding to this criteria consider:
(How can you demonstrate that the "work" is value for money?)
• The cost of this piece of work
• Whether it will have positive cost/impact implications for future work
• Do you consider it to be value for money
• If so, how do you know that

 

CASE STUDY: The ability to be used as a model or case study by other agencies. When responding to this criteria consider:
• What have you learnt from this piece of work that would be interesting to others
• Whether this piece of work could be a model for other communities or the subject of a case study
• Whether there anything you have learned that you would do differently that others could benefit from knowing about

Judging Criteria of Outstanding Initiative Awards

Judging Criteria for Emerging Recreation Leader of the Year

Judging Criteria for the Ian Galloway Memorial Cup, Paul Stuart Memorial Award and Mark Mitchell Memorial Trophy